X
Search Filters
Format Format
Subjects Subjects
Subjects Subjects
X
Sort by Item Count (A-Z)
Filter by Count
ethics (15) 15
jurisprudence (14) 14
human rights (12) 12
humans (11) 11
law (11) 11
philosophy (10) 10
reviews (10) 10
books (9) 9
analysis (8) 8
book reviews (8) 8
data protection (7) 7
laws, regulations and rules (7) 7
privacy (7) 7
gewirth (6) 6
health (6) 6
science (6) 6
united kingdom (6) 6
consent (5) 5
europe (5) 5
genetic engineering (5) 5
law and legislation (5) 5
research (5) 5
bioethics (4) 4
biomedical research (4) 4
biotechnology (4) 4
confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence (4) 4
crime prevention (4) 4
data collection (4) 4
internationality (4) 4
kant (4) 4
legal positivism (4) 4
legislation & jurisprudence (4) 4
medical ethics (4) 4
medical records (4) 4
medicine (4) 4
moral and ethical aspects (4) 4
morality (4) 4
natural law (4) 4
privacy, right of (4) 4
research subjects (4) 4
attitudes (3) 3
beliefs, opinions and attitudes (3) 3
capital punishment (3) 3
cloning (3) 3
cloning, organism (3) 3
computer security (3) 3
congresses (3) 3
constitutional law (3) 3
contracts (3) 3
disclosure (3) 3
ethical aspects (3) 3
ethics, medical (3) 3
european union countries (3) 3
freedom (3) 3
great britain (3) 3
human reproductive technology (3) 3
informed consent (3) 3
law and ethics (3) 3
medical law (3) 3
moral obligations (3) 3
patient rights (3) 3
personal autonomy (3) 3
philosophy of medicine (3) 3
political philosophy (3) 3
risk assessment (3) 3
rule of law (3) 3
social sciences (3) 3
a priori knowledge (2) 2
access control (2) 2
behavior deterrence (2) 2
bibliography (2) 2
bioethical issues (2) 2
business & company law (2) 2
categorical impartiality (2) 2
commerce (2) 2
commodification (2) 2
confidentiality (2) 2
constitution (2) 2
contract law (2) 2
criminal law (2) 2
criminology (2) 2
culture (2) 2
databescherming (2) 2
defendants (2) 2
derecho a la intimidad (2) 2
dignity (2) 2
disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence (2) 2
droit (2) 2
ec law (2) 2
empirical evidence (2) 2
epistemology (2) 2
ethical theory (2) 2
ethics and professional values (2) 2
ethics committees, research (2) 2
ethiek (2) 2
ethik (2) 2
etik: rättsvetenskap (2) 2
european law (2) 2
european union (2) 2
fetus (2) 2
more...
Library Location Library Location
Library Location Library Location
X
Sort by Item Count (A-Z)
Filter by Count
Law (Bora Laskin) - Stacks (4) 4
Robarts - Stacks (4) 4
Gerstein Science - Stacks (3) 3
UTL at Downsview - May be requested (3) 3
Collection Dvlpm't (Acquisitions) - Closed Orders (2) 2
Criminology - Stacks (2) 2
Online Resources - Online (1) 1
Robarts - Course Reserves (1) 1
St. Michael's College (John M. Kelly) - 2nd Floor (1) 1
St. Michael's College (John M. Kelly) - 3rd Floor (1) 1
more...
Language Language
Publication Date Publication Date
Click on a bar to filter by decade
Slide to change publication date range


1978, Bibliographical series - University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology, Volume no. 8, xiii, p. 599-623 & microfiches (11 x 15 cm.) in pocket. --
Book
1986, ISBN 0421329203, xxix, 483
Book
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, ISSN 0003-9101, 10/2019, Volume 101, Issue 3, pp. 469 - 471
Journal Article
2007, Legal theory today, ISBN 9781841136794, xvii, 388
Book
2004, Data protection and medical research in Europe, ISBN 075462367X, x, 252
Book
1990, Studies in law and politics., ISBN 0335094872, viii, 64
Book
Human Rights Review, ISSN 1524-8879, 3/2012, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 1 - 18
Alan Gewirth’s claim that agents contradict that they are agents if they do not accept that the principle of generic consistency (PGC) is the supreme principle... 
Philosophy of Law | Ethics | Human rights | Law | Gewirth | Principle of generic consistency | Political Philosophy | Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History | Political Science, general | Kant | Philosophers | Skepticism | Analysis | Beliefs, opinions and attitudes | Philosophy | Kant, Immanuel | Gewirth, Alan
Journal Article
International Journal of Law in Context, ISSN 1744-5523, 06/2019, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp. 198 - 218
AbstractIn the context of a technology-driven algorithmic approach to criminal justice, this paper responds to the following three questions: (1) what reasons... 
punishment | algorithmic criminal justice | human rights | technological management | Gewirthian moral theory | false positives | prevention
Journal Article
Journal of Moral Philosophy, ISSN 1740-4681, 09/2015, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp. 573 - 597
Christine Korsgaard claims that Gewirth's argument for morality fails to demonstrate that there is a categorically binding principle on action because it... 
categorical impartiality | Gewirth | public reasons | Kant | Korsgaard | PHILOSOPHY | ETHICS
Journal Article
1990, Studies in law and politics., ISBN 033509631X, xiii, 74
Book
Law, Innovation and Technology, ISSN 1757-9961, 07/2017, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp. 301 - 317
A public outcry opposing the use of genetic modification of rice has produced a governance deadlock in China, which threatens to undermine attempts to reap the... 
risk assessment | Chinese agricultural biotechnology | Gewirth | public participation | social media | precaution
Journal Article
Journal of Moral Philosophy, ISSN 1740-4681, 2013, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 204 - 226
According to Bernard Williams, attempts to justify a categorically binding impartial principle fail because they can only establish categorically binding... 
categorical impartiality | Williams | universalization | Gewirth | Kant | PHILOSOPHY | ETHICS
Journal Article
No results were found for your search.

Cannot display more than 1000 results, please narrow the terms of your search.